The New York Times, it is probably one of the most famous newspapers in the world, yet people criticize it for its bias. Because of all the criticism I have heard about the New York Times, I was cautious reading the first couple articles. I don’t know why I really expected this, but I was certain that I would read some outlandish statement that would shake me to my core. That didn’t happen. In fact, I have not really come across too much bias in stories. That could because I might share the same bias as the New York Times because I mostly just read the world news. And obviously I would have an American perspective of what is going on until I read a different perspective like from the BBC. As I learn more about the events in the world, however, I will probably notice more of a bias within the New York Times.
As far as what stories I have noticed using the New York Times, I notice what I see on the main page and on the world news page. I know this isn’t the best way to find out what is happening, so I do probably miss a lot of news. I know I don’t ever see what kind of news is happening locally unless I go home and see it on the television. Literally, someone could have been shot three blocks away and I would not know about it if I didn’t see the police cars heading over to the scene. I’m not proud of this. On the other hand, I could tell you what kinds of things are happening with Iran or with Italian cruise ships! Reading the New York Times has not really influenced my news habits, I still only know headline news. But realizing this might just have enough impact on my thinking for me to dig deeper into stories. Maybe.
No comments:
Post a Comment